Site Map Quest. & Ans. Glossary Timeline For Teachers Review Article Central link

# Teaching about the Earth's Magnetism in Earth Sciences Class

#### Talk presented at the Baltimore Meeting of the Natl. Science Teacher Assoc., 18 November 2000

This is Part 3 of three
Go to Part 1
Go to Part 2

## Dynamos in Nature

How can you create electric currents? One way is a battery, which does so by chemical processes. However, the current which we use every day in our home is generated in other ways--by electric generators, also known as "dynamos."

All dynamos are based on principles found by Michael Faraday a few years after Oersted's discovery--basically, an electric current is created in a wire or electric conductor that moves through the region of magnetic forces (also known as "magnetic field"). In the generators of the power station, the wires rotate near electromagnets (or vice versa, the magnets rotate and the wires do not move).

But the conductor can also be a conducting fluid flowing through a magnetic field. Faraday himself in 1832 tried to measure electric currents created this way, by the flow of London's river Thames across the magnetic field of the earth. The circuit was completed by a copper wire, strung across Waterloo Bridge in London, its ends dipping into the water. The current was too weak to be measured, but the principle was correct.

We believe that the uneven rotation of the hot gases on the Sun--fastest near the equator, as the motion of sunspots shows--helps create electric currents in this manner. Not all details of the process are understood, because we can only guess what goes on under the surface of the Sun, in regions we cannot see, but the web site explains some of the ideas.

 The Earth's Core
Neither can we see how the molten iron of the core flows (earthquake waves tell that the innermost part is solid again), even though its flows may be very slow. They may be driven by the heat released by radioactivity, or by the solidification of the inner core--again, we can only guess. The theory of the process is very mathematical and intricate, because to produce the currents, you need not only a flow of liquid iron, you also need a magnetic field, and this field is none other, but the one created by the currents themselves! The web site gives some general ideas, but the details are too hard for this level.

## Reversals of the Earth's Magnetic Poles

The drawing below is again taken of Gilbert's book. "Auster" is south--remember "Australia"--and the smith is hammering a bar of hot iron, as it cools down while lined up in the north-south direction. Gilbert noticed that such a bar became weakly magnetized, with the polarity appropriate to its direction, and viewed it as the iron being "reborn" and in the process (like a baby that starts breathing) acquiring the magnetism of its mother, the Earth.

 Gilbert's Blacksmith
We now know that other materials also acquire a weak magnetization as they cool down in the direction of the prevailing field of the Earth. Among them is basalt, a black rock created when a common type of volcanic lava solidifies. Its magnetism is weak, but lava in general comes out in huge masses, so that it shows up in the total field.

(Bricks and pottery, by the way, also do so. Magnetic observatories often keep sensitive instruments in wooden sheds, because brick walls may affect observations.)

Early in this century scientists realized that ancient lava flows may tell about variations of the Earth's magnetic field in the past. They were in for a surprise: some old lavas had the same north-south polarity as the Earth has now, but others had the opposite polarity. For a while the issue was confused by certain chemical processes, which can reverse the polarity of some magnetic minerals. But in 1952 Jan Hospers, studying basalts in Iceland, came with convincing proof that the first impression was the right one--that there existed long periods in the past, when the north-south magnetic polarity of the Earth was reversed.

 The gradual weakening of the Earth's Dipolar Field
That discovery echoed an interesting trend. The first person to devise a method of analyzing the Earth's field mathematically and estimating its strength was the German mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss, around 1838 (details on the web site).

Comparing his observations with recent ones--and with those made in-between--shows that the north-south field of the Earth is weakening by about 5% per century, maybe even a bit faster. No one of course guarantees the trend will continue for 2000 years, until the poles are reversed. In fact, the field has twists and features that are added on top of the simple two-pole structure, and these seem to be getting stronger.

What it all suggests is that inside the core of the Earth, where flows of liquid iron create the currents responsible for the magnetism of the Earth, the flow pattern can be quite complicated. There may be several independent eddies, and some grow stronger, others weaker, changing the pattern. One can construct systems where the currents of eddy A produce the magnetic field of eddy B, and vice versa, and such systems can in principle create magnetic reversals.

The Sun also has a polar magnetic field, and its polarity reverses in each sunspot cycle, every 11 years or so. More about that, again, on the web site.

By the way--I get a fair amount of e-mail related to the web site. One question that comes up again and again (and you too may get it from a student) is--what happens to life during magnetic reversals? When the magnetic field of the Earth no longer protects us from space radiation, is our life in danger?

The answer is no. It is true that the magnetic field deflects space radiation, but the protection is very weak near the magnetic poles, e.g. in parts of Alaska. Yet people live and work there. Our true protection is the atmosphere, equivalent to about 10-12 feet of concrete. Future astronauts on Mars--which only has a weak magnetic field and a very thin atmosphere--may have to get into underground shelters when the Sun lets go, but we here are safe.

(Also, the magnetic field apparently does not vanish during reversals--it just gets weaker and more complex. If it did completely vanish for a really long time, it is just possible that the solar wind would indeed erode our atmosphere.)

## Ocean Floor Magnetization

 Alfred Wegener
I don't know how much you teach your classes about plate tectonics, the modern name to what was once called continental drift. It is well known that the coastlines of Africa and South America fit together, and that the edges of other continents also show such fits. Here you have a picture of the German scientist Alfred Wegener--polar explorer, balloonist and climate specialist--who published in 1918 a book, proposing that the continents at one time were in fact together, and later drifted apart.

He formulated his ideas in a military hospital, while recovering from wounds suffered as an army officer in World War I. He based them, not just on the similarity of coastlines but also on the matching of geological formations on opposite sides of the ocean, even matching animal and plant life. He viewed continents as slabs of lighter rock, floating like ice floes on denser minerals below them. That was an accepted idea in geology, and still is.

But he also imagined them drifting, like ice floes in the ocean, and with that most geologists disagreed. Those lower rocks are tough stuff, they argued, and unlike the ocean, they would strongly resist any motion through them.

For about 50 years only a few supporters were found. Wegener himself died in 1931, caught by bad weather while traveling by dogsled across Greenland. What gave his ideas new credibility were reversals of the Earth's magnetic field and measurements of the magnetization of the ocean floor.

 The Mid-Atlantic Ridge
Oceanographers and in particular seismologists--scientists studying earthquakes--had long noticed an interesting feature in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean, about halfway between America and Africa or Europe. Earthquakes traced to the Atlantic Ocean almost always originated there, and some volcanic islands--the Azores, St. Helena, sections of Iceland--also straddled that line. On the sea bottom that line contained a long volcanic ridge, and Harry Hess of Princeton proposed this was a major crack in the crust of the Earth, from which lava flowed in both directions.

Up to the 1950s, magnetic fields were measured by magnetic needles suspended in one way or another. Then some quite sensitive electronic instruments were developed, and these could be put on a wooden boat, towed behind a ship, or in a package suspended from an airplane. Oil companies started mapping magnetic irregularities from airplanes, hoping to find clues to oil deposits: on land, all the patterns they found were irregular.

 The First Mapping of Sea-Floor   Magnetization near the Mid-Atlantic Ridge
But oceanographers, mapping the effect of the ocean floor on the overall magnetic field, found an orderly pattern. The sea-floor was magnetized in long stripes lined up (in the Atlantic) with the mid-ocean ridge, stripes of opposite magnetic polarity. When these were finally mapped in 1965--the picture you see here--they turned out to be amazingly symmetric.

Maps like this one led to a new view, by which continents were indeed moving. America was moving away from Europe and Africa, though not exactly the way Wegener had proposed. Rather, the deeper layers on which they floated--the "lithospheric plates"-- were pulled away to both sides of the mid-Atlantic ridge, at about one inch per year, carrying the continents with them. As they pulled apart, volcanic lava oozed up into the crack between them, hardened into basalt, and became part of one plate or the other.

And here is where magnetism entered the picture: as the lava hardened into basalt, it acquired a magnetic polarity, due to the magnetic field of the Earth. However, every half-million years or so, the polarity of the Earth's field reversed, and the basalt, too, became magnetized reversely. The Atlantic seafloor was like a giant magnetic tape (or rather, twin tapes moving in opposite directions), unreeling at a rate of one inch a year and recording each polarity reversal of the magnetic field as long stripe of magnetization.

There is much more to the story, but you will have to look it up on the web site.

• About Larry Morley, a Canadian, who in 1962 first proposed this idea, but had his article rejected by the journals as being too far out, too speculative.
• About Fred Vine and Drummond Matthews, who had better luck in publishing.
• About the ocean trenches, the deepest parts of the ocean floor, where tectonic plates again descend into deeper parts of the Earth.
• About plates in other oceans, and in particular, the Pacific Plate at the western edge of the US, which does not move towards or away the land, but rotates. As it does, it carries with it a sliver of California, and the break between it and the rest of the US continent is the famous San Andreas fault.
•  All these and more you will find on the web site "The Great Magnet, the Earth." By all means, read it. And if what you heard in the past hour seems interesting and relevant to Earth Sciences and to magnetism--then your students may feel so, too, when you retell these stories to them.

Go to Part 1
Go to Part 2

### Back to the Master List

Author and Curator:   Dr. David P. Stern
Mail to Dr.Stern:   earthmag("at" symbol)phy6.org

Last updated 25 November 2001
Re-formatted 9-27-2004